Control Systems and Computers

https://doi.org/10.15407/csc.2024.02.048

Манако А.Ф., Манако В.В. Моделі аналізу даних навчання суб’єкту впродовж життя. Control Systems and Computers. 2024. № 2. C. 48-64

УДК 303.721; 004.03142

А.Ф. МАНАКО, д.т.н., проф., зав. від. Міжнародний науково-навчальний центр інформаційних технологій і систем НАН та МОН України, 03187, м. Київ, просп. Академіка Глушкова, 40, Київ, Україна, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-7118, afmanako@gmail.com

В.В. МАНАКО, канд. фіз.-мат. наук, с.н.с., Український мовно-інформаційний фонд НАН України, 01030, м. Київ, вул. Володимирська, 54, Україна, ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4945-1892, manvv104@gmail.com

МОДЕЛІ АНАЛІЗУ ДАНИХ НАВЧАННЯ СУБ’ЄКТА ВПРОДОВЖ ЖИТТЯ

На основі фундаментальних фактів, ідей і системних методологій, на вищому рівні формалізації, розроблено та змістовно інтерпретовано базисні системотворчі елементи, конструктиви моделювання, загальну модель, моделі успадкування та реєстру задач із метою систематичного поліпшення розуміння прогресу результатів, якості продуктів, послуг та прийняття обґрунтованих рішень на базі методів та інструментів аналізу даних навчання суб’єкта впродовж життя за допомогою доступної системи керування.

Download full text! (On Ukrainian)

Ключові слова: цифрові трансформації, Великі дані, формалізація, систематизація, успадкування, Глосарій, реєстр задач, система керування.

1. National Research Council. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. 2000. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/9853.
2. Manako, F. (2022). “Systematic Investigation of Continuous E-Learning as a Complex Information System”. Control Systems and Computers, no 3, pp. 53-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/csc.2022.03.053.
3. Osma, J.I.P., Lopez, D.A.G., Porra, A.A. (2021). “Maturity Model for Virtual Education”. Journal Of E-learning and Higher Education, 4 (11). Article ID 228061, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5171/2021.228061.
4. Valverde-Berrocoso, J., Garrido-Arroyo, M. D. C., Burgos-Videla, C., & Morales-Cevallos, M. B. (2020). “Trends in educational research about e-learning: A systematic literature review (2009-2018)”. Sustainability, 12 (12), 5153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125153.
5. Webb, S., Holford, J., Hodge, S., Milana, M., Waller, R. (2019). “Conceptualising lifelong learning for sustainable development and education 2030”. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 38(3), pp. 237-
6. Wiener, M., Saunders, C., & Marabelli, M. (2020). “Big-data business models: A critical literature review and multiperspective research framework”. Journal of Information Technology, 35(1), 66-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396219896811.
7. Van de Heyde, V., & Siebrits, A. (2019). “The ecosystem of e-learning model for higher education”. South African Journal of Science, 115 (5-6), pp. 1-
8. Balabanov, S. (2019). “Big Data Analytics: principles, trends and tasks (a survey)”. Problems of programming. (2), pp. 47–68.
9. Nygren, H., Nissinen, K., Hamalainen, R., De Wever, B. (2019). “Lifelong learning: Formal, non-formal and informal learning in the context of the use of the problem-solving skills in technology-rich environments”. British journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), pp. 1759–1770.
10. Iden, J., Methlie, L. B., Christensen, G. E. (2017). “The nature of strategic foresight research: A systematic literature review”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, pp. 87–97.
11. Lai, P.C. (2017). “The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology”. ISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14, pp. 21–38.
12. ISO/IEC TR 20748-2:2017. Information technology for learning, education and training – Learning analytics interoperability. Part 2: System requirements.
13. ISO/IEC TR 20748-1:2016. Information technology for learning, education and training – Learning analytics interoperability. Part 1: Reference model.
14. Caliper Analytics. [online]. Available at: <https://www.imsglobal.org/activity/caliper> [Accessed 01 Feb. 2017].
15. Kapitonova, V., Letichevsky, A.A. Paradigms of V.M. Glushkova. [online]. Available at: <http://ogas.kiev.ua/en/glushkov/paradygmy-glushkova> [Accessed 05 Sept. 2023].
16. Laal, M. (2011). “Lifelong learning: What does it mean?”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, pp. 470–474.
17. Khan, B. H. (2010). “The global e-learning framework”. E-learning, pp. 42–51.
18. Nilsson, S. (2010). “Enhancing Individual Employability. The Perspective of Engineering Graduates”. Education + Training, 52, 540–551.
19. Educational Modeling Languages: A Conceptual Introduction and a High-Level Classification /I.L Martinez-Ortiz, P. Moreno-Ger, J.L. Sierra. Computers and Education 2007, pp. 27– 40.
20. Manako A.F. (2006). “An approach to modeling the purposeful development of innovative information technologies “educational objects”. Problems of programming. (2-3), pp. 475–481.
21. Zgurovsky, M.Z., Pankratova N.D. (2005). System analysis: problems, methodology, applications. K.: Naukova dumka, 744 p.
22. Manako A.F. (2005). “Models of aggregation of conceptual objects of continuous learning with the support of information and telecommunication technologies”. Systemic research and information technologies. 3, pp. 29–37.
23. Norris, D., Mason, J., & Lefrere, P. (2003). Transforming e-Knowledge, Society for College and University Planning: Ann Arbor, USA. 168 p.
24. “IEEE Standard for Learning Object Metadata,” in IEEE Std 1484.12.1-2020 , vol., no., pp.1-50, 16 Nov. 2020, DOI: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2020.9262118.
25. Digital Opportunities for All: Meeting the Challenge. Report of the Digital Opportunity Task Force (DOT Force), 11 May 2001. 24 p.
26. A memorandum on life-long learning (2000). Commission staff working paper. Brussels, SEC, No 1832, 36 p.
27. Baldrige National Quality Program. (2000). Education Criteria for Performance Excellence. NIST, Guithersburg, MD 20899-1020. 54 p.
28. Baker T., Birlinghoven S. A. (2000). “Grammar of Dublin Core”. D-Lib Magazine, 6 (10), https://www.dlib.org/dlib/october00/baker/10baker.html.
29. Bearman, D., Miller, E., Rust, G., Trant, J., & Weibel, S. (1999). “ A common model to support interoperable metadata”. D-Lib magazine, 5(1), 1082-9873.
30. Lassila, O. (1997). Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification. W3C Rec. 134 p.
31. Clark, R.E. (1999). “The Cognitive Science and Human Performance Technology”. In D. Stolovitsch, E.J. Keeps, Handbook of Human Performance Technology. San Francasco: Jossey-Bass-Pfeiffer. pp. 82-95.
32. Sinitsa, K, Manako, (1999). “Extending glossary role in a virtual learning environment”. Proceeding of ComNEd’99 IFIP Conference, Finland, pp. 321–327.
33. Communications and Networking in Education: Learning in a Networked Society (2001). Editer by: Downes T. & Watson D. Kluwer Academic Publishers. USA. 348 p.
34. Sinitsa,, Manako, A. (1999). “Interactive Dictionary as an Information Wish-maker”. Educational Technology Magazine, pp. 22–25.
35. Sinitsa, K.M., & Manako, A.F. (1999). “Interactive Dictionary in a context of learning”. In Proceedings of the HCI International’99 (the 8th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction) on Human-Computer Interaction: Communication, Cooperation, and Application Design. Vol. pp. 662-666.
36. Dempsey, K., Heery, R. (1998). “Metadata: Current view of practice and issues”. Journal of Documentation. No 54 (2), pp. 145–172.
37. Gagne, R., Briggs, L. & Wager, W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th Ed.). Fort Worth, TX: HBJ College. 44–46.
38. Kolmogorov,N. (1987). “Three approaches to defining the concept of “amount of information”. Information theory and algorithm theory, pp. 213–223.
39. Virt, Algorithms + data structures = programs. M.: Mir, 1985. 406 p.
40. Ivanchenko (Manako),F., Kondratiev, A.I. (1984). “Logical structures in algorithms for calculating estimates”. Cybernetics. No. 4, pp. 121–123.
41. Glushkov, V.M. About cybernetics as a science. Cybernetics, thinking, life. M.: Nauka, 1964. 53 p.

Надійшла  29.11.2023