Control Systems and Computers, N5, 2018, Article 6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/usim.2018.05.062
Upr. sist. maš., 2018, Issue 5 (277), pp. 62-68.
UDC 681.513.7
Yaroslav M. Antonyuk, researcher, International Research and Training Centre of Information Technologies and Systems of the NAS and MES of Ukraine, Glushkov ave., 40, Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine, E-mail: ant@noc.irtc.org.ua,
Performance evaluation of computer campus network segments
The task of evaluating the performance of computer networks and their segments is considered – one of the main issues of the formation and functioning of modern campuses, educational spaces and corporate cloud solutions. To measure the characteristics of network performance, certain measurements were made on a sequence of packets arriving at some interface of a network device. Two types of existing measurements in the network are compared: active measurements and passive measurements.
Conclusions are drawn about the possibility of measuring between any two nodes, or points, of the network based on preliminary data on the throughput capacity of individual network elements.
The data transfer rate can be measured between any two nodes, or points, of a network, for example, between a client computer and a server, between the input and output ports of a router, and to analyze and configure the network to know the data on the throughput of individual network elements.
Download full text! (In English)
Keywords: campus network ,rate of traffic ripple, ripple value, peak information rate, sustained information rate, variation in packet delay, round trip time, network response.
1. Manako, A.F., Sinica, E.M., 2006. “Sovremennye nauchnoobrazovatel’nye prostranstva: tekhnologii i podhody”. Proc. 1-st Intern. Conf. ITEA-2006. 29–31 May 2006, Kiev: IRTC, pp. 37–51. (In Ukrainian).
2. Bekhterev, A.A. Kachestvo setej peredachi dannyh. Programmnye i apparatnye izmereniya. [online] Available at: < https://habr.com/post/250821/> [Accessed 16 Oct. 2017].
3. Konnov, A.L., Bahareva, N.F., Tarasov, V.N. “Issledovanie processov funkcionirovaniya LVS na imitacionnyh modelyah s cel’yu ee optimizacii”. Perspektivnye informacionnye tekhnologii v nauchnyh issledovaniyah, proektirovanii i obuchenii. Trudy nauchno-tekhnicheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Samara, 2006, pp. 208-215. (In Russian).
4. Antonyuk, Ya.M., 2012. “Analiz sovremennyh podhodov k organizacii telekommunikacionnoj infrastruktury kampusnyh komp’yuternyh setej nauchno-obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva akademicheskih uchrezhdenij”. Upravlausie sistemy i masiny, 2012, 3, pp. 79 -85. (In Russian).
5. RFC2679. A One-way Delay Metric for IPPM. [online] Available at: <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2679> [Accessed16 Oct. 2017].
6. RFC 2861. TCP Congestion Window Validation. [online] Available at: <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2861> [Accessed 16 Oct. 2017].
7. RFC3393 IP Packet Delay Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM). [online] Available at: <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3393> [Accessed 16 Oct. 2017].
8. Gricenko, V.I., Ursatev, A.A., 2011. “Informacionnye tekhnologii – tendenciya, puti razvitiya”. Upravlausie sistemy i masiny, 5, pp. 3–20. (In Russian).
Received 04.12.18
